STATEMENT FROM DR. EARL C. JOHNSON, PRESIDENT OF THE
RALEIGH WAKE CITIZENS ASSOCIATION (RWCA) on the Wake School Board
Shakeup
The Raleigh Wake Citizens Association, which has represented the
interests of the diverse citizens of the second largest county in the State of
North Carolina for more than 80 years, has been unsettled by the news that Wake
County School Board Member Keith Sutton has been replaced after serving for one
year as board Chairman. We have, specifically, several immediate concerns about
this matter, which happened without any indication of misdeeds or improper
actions by Mr. Sutton.
To begin, Keith Sutton’s resume as a seasoned and well-regarded
leader did not begin when he was elected to the Wake County School Board in
2009. From his work with such organizations such as the NAACP and the National
Urban League to his work with the North Carolina Department of Juvenile Justice
and Delinquency Prevention and the Victim Advocate Liaison for the North
Carolina Governor’s Crime Commission, Keith’s service to his community is
rarely seen in the office of an elected official. His election to the school
board was simply an extension of his commitment to the lives of young people,
including his daughters, who are students with the Wake County Public School
System.
When he became Chairman of the Board last year, he was faced
with the aftermath of a divided body rife with internecine feuds and allegations
of inappropriate conduct among board members. Keith managed to assuage the
community while building coalitions among his colleagues. Over the past year,
he also oversaw the hiring of a new superintendent, an $810 million school
construction bond issue and staved off a proposed takeover by county
commissioners. That type of leadership in North Carolina and indeed, in Wake
County, is an uncommon sight.
Most disturbing about the recent move, however, is that the vote
among Board members was divided along racial lines. If Mr. Sutton had not voted
for himself, he would have only had one other supporter --- and that supporter
is one of the newest members of the Board. How could an incoming member
recognize the significance of his leadership and his longtime colleagues reject
it? If, indeed, the board members feel as though their actions were justified,
could they not have reached out to leaders in the community in advance? The
answers that we have received thus far are simply reactionary and our minds are
not settled at this point.
Finally, we wish to express to the remaining board members that
this is a new day. It is not lost on us that many, if not all of you, have
visited our meetings and attended our public forums during election seasons.
You have sought our endorsements and seek our assistance with your campaign
canvassing and fundraising efforts. The upcoming elections of 2016 may seem far
off, but our memories are even longer. This slight of one of our brightest
leaders is not something that we take lightly. Keith Sutton represented a
beacon of hope to the thousands of young African-American students who are
educated under his watch. In an era in which our President is besieged by
hostile forces within the GOP, we, the membership of the Raleigh Wake Citizens,
feel as though WCSB Member Keith Sutton has been similarly maligned.
Our minds are not settled with this matter.
Yours in progress,
Reverend Dr. Earl C. Johnson
President
EXCLUSIVE
WHY WAS CHAIRMAN
SUTTON OUSTED?
By Cash Michaels
An analysis
To sit in
the audience of Tuesday night’s historic Wake County Board of Education meeting
was, in the words of one observer, “shocking.”
With no
reason given, all seven of the embattled board’s white members, in what was
clearly a pre-planned event, voted without delay, to oust the body’s
African-American chairman, Keith Sutton.
Only two
people on the nine-member board voted for Sutton to remain chair – Monika
Johnson-Hostler, who had just been sworn-in representing District 2 – and
Sutton himself.
Johnson-Hostler,
like the board chairman she supported, is also African-American.
When
pressed moments later by the media after the stunning vote, the white board
members, the majority of whom are Democrats, insisted that race was not the
reason for their extraordinary, and yet clearly united action.
They all
knew what they had just done looked like, and had reportedly tried to head it
off behind the scenes by urging Sutton, their target, to actually be the one to
nominate his “replacement,” Christine Kushner, as the new chair.
Again,
“race had nothing to do with this,” even though the sight of the outgoing black
board chairman nominating his white female vice chair to take his seat, would
certainly absolve the white majority of any bad optics that could be assigned
to their apparent coup d’état.
Sutton,
unbeknownst to the public, stoically refused to do the majority’s dirty work
for them. For the past year, when the credibility of the Wake School Board was
as about as thin as a wet paper towel, it was Sutton who marched forward, as
chairman, and tackled the big issues.
Unlike many
of his colleagues on the school board, Sutton had the political tools to get
the job of restoring the board’s battered credibility done. The father of two
children and UNC alumnus, Sutton had served as executive director of the NC
NAACP; president and CEO of the Triangle Chapter of the National Urban League;
had worked as a field operative in Barack Obama’s 2008 NC presidential
campaign; was working in state government; and finally, was chosen by the Wake
School Board in 2009 to finish out the unexpired term of the departing
Chairwoman Rosa Gill, ultimately becoming board chairman himself in December
2012 after the firing of Tea Party Supt. Tony Tata, a remnant of the disastrous
Ron Margiotta – John Tedesco years which tore the school board, and the
community, apart.
The Wake
School Board was in tatters. Public confidence in its ability to do anything
right had waned, and the Democratic board majority became the partisan target
of the Republican-led Wake County Commission Board, which threatened, after
Tata’s firing, not to cooperate with promoting the passage of the badly needed
$810 million school construction bond.
And if that
wasn’t threat enough, the GOP commissioners, deciding to further taunt the
school board while it was clearly on its knees, unexpectedly moved
legislatively to take control and management of the Wake school system’s buildings
and properties, and also change the school board’s redistricting lines in order
for Republicans to have an easier time taking back control.
Couple all
of that with the added challenges of hiring a new schools superintendent;
crafting a workable budget in the midst of severe cutbacks; dealing with how to
enhance school campus security in the midst of national shooting tragedies; and
launching a new student assignment plan – all with two Tea Party holdovers from
the previous Republican majority trying to sabotage the Democrats at every turn
– and it was clear that the Wake School Board would be lucky if it was able to
accomplish even half of that daunting agenda in a year.
But
Chairman Sutton did, and never flinched.
The Rocky
Mount native learned tactical politics at the feet of such giants as Vernon
Malone – the first black Wake School Board chairman; Ralph Campbell, Jr. –
North Carolina’s first black state auditor; and Carolyn Q. Coleman – Guilford County Commissioner and member of the national NAACP Board of Directors.
Those accomplished
black elected leaders taught Sutton how to work within the system; how to be
professional when under great pressure to react otherwise; and most
importantly, how not to wear your politics on your sleeve when you’re elected
to serve all of the people.
They taught him discipline, and strategy.
They taught him discipline, and strategy.
And it also
helped, ironically enough, that because Sutton was black, and represented
predominately-black District 4 in East Raleigh, that much wasn’t expected of
him by many of his white board colleagues anyway.
Sutton’s
constituents weren’t bankers, lawyers and businessmen for the most part. They
were struggling black families amidst high unemployment, and a higher crime rate
than any other school district, through no fault of their own. Their children
were in more need of educational resources than any other in the county, and Sutton’s main
goal was to give them a voice at the table.
So with the
board chairmanship too hot handle after the Tata debacle, why not give it to
Sutton for a year? It gave the rest of the board’s Democrats a chance to
regroup, they thought. Sutton had made a deal with then Chairman Kevin Hill to
succeed him after a year anyway, so why not let him have it, and let the
Republicans focus on him, and not us?
Besides,
Kushner was installed as board vice chairman to make sure that when Chair
Sutton stumbled or his most likely troubled term was finished, she, District 8’s Susan Evans, District 5’s Jim Martin, and
the battered Kevin Hill, would be in a position to clean up, and maybe even, take
some credit.
Problem though
– Sutton was more than capable of handling the task of leadership without them, and
they soon came to realize that.
And not like it.
And not like it.
From the hiring
a legislative lobbyist to combat the GOP-led county commission board’s attempt
to strip Wake school property control from them, to calmly meeting with then
Wake Commission Board Chairman Joe Bryan to ensure that there would be a
partnership to make passage of the school construction bonds a reality,
Sutton’s political instincts told him that while his board colleagues were
eager to ride the school board bus to accompany him to every chairman-to-chairman
meeting, that just wasn’t possible.
Sutton’s
political training told him that in tight, controversial and politically
explosive situations, personal relationships between leaders matter greatly.
Trust is both developed, coveted, and then leveraged for the greater good, and
for their respective boards to later ratify, or reject.
A staunch
Democrat, Sutton never led with his politics, a deadly mistake Kushner, Evans
and Martin had already made, making them so politically toxic that even Tea Party Supt.
Tata felt the need to attack all three publicly before he was fired.
Sutton was
never really a right-wing target because he didn’t make himself one, thus allowing him
better opportunities to talk turkey with what otherwise would be Republican
adversaries. And when he didn’t like what he was hearing, he put his foot down.
But Sutton
also had two other weapons few recognized for what they really were – he was
deceptively understated, but fiercely independent.
Sutton
studied his Democratic colleagues, his Republican adversaries, and the challenges
that he had to face as chairman, and he quietly planned accordingly. He knew
who, and who not to take with him into certain situations, if at all, because
ultimately, success was the main goal under difficult circumstances.
Kushner and
Evans were of limited use because of their stated liberalism and associations.
Jim Martin,
an NC State University professor, could be counted on to give laborious
lectures at the board table without invitation. And his aggressive, and at
times erratic behavior during a joint meeting with the Wake Board of
Commissioners during sensitive school bond negotiations, only crystalized the
need to keep him away from the important stuff.
Former
Chairman Kevin Hill was so battered by the board Republicans’ abuse, he not
only gladly stepped down, but actually changed his party registration from
Democrat to unaffiliated, just to get out of the political line of fire. This,
after the county Democratic Party, a year earlier, poured hundreds of thousands
of dollars into his 2011 re-election campaign.
Moderate
Republican Bill Fletcher didn’t take long, upon being selected to fill an
unexpired board term several months ago, to let Chairman Sutton know that he
marched to a different drummer.
And former
Principal Tom Benton, another selected board member, also saw things
differently than Sutton, and said so.
So the best
the chairman, who would ultimately be blamed if any of the board’s challenges
imploded, could do was trust his own instincts and political skills to get the
job done.
Sutton
forged ahead, making sure, according to a source who worked with him closely to
pave the way in his many lobbying efforts, to keep his board colleagues
informed, and also monitor what was happening in their respective board
committee meetings.
When he
could attend some of those committee meetings, as an ex-officio member, Sutton
would, schedule permitting. But working to solve the challenges facing the
board was his priority, and by all accounts - when he wasn’t in his district speaking with constituents or holding community events - that’s what Sutton spent the most time
doing.
As stated
by the Raleigh-Wake Citizens Association last week in its appeal to the school
board that Chairman Sutton deserved another term, when the smoke from the past
year cleared, he had:
- Filled two board vacancies;
-
Passed a balanced budget in a continued fragile economy;
-
Hired a superintendent in a transparent, fair, and open process;
-
Defeated efforts by Wake Commissioners to control school construction
and maintenance
of facilities;
-
Obtained community support for passage of an $810 million bond referendum;
-
Continued development and implementation of a new student assignment plan that
contained no reassignments for the upcoming school year; and
-
Convened a task force on school and campus safety that produced recommendations
for improved security across the school district.
A strong
record even his board colleagues could not deny.
And that
was also a problem.
Passage of
the school bond – Sutton led the way.
Hiring of
Supt. Jim Merrill – Sutton led the way.
Convening a
school security task force – the chairman had the lead.
Defeating
the Wake Commission effort to control school properties – Sutton spent over
$100,000 for a legislative lobbyist, and got the job done.
But wait a
minute – all of the above was put to a board vote, and approved accordingly. So
Sutton’s colleagues DID have say.
However,
prior to Tuesday’s vote to dump Sutton, the accusation, as related to The Carolinian by the one Wake School
Board member who did return a request for comment, was that Chairman Sutton
would go it alone too much, didn’t have time for important meetings, and would
not collaborate with others.
The fact
that he got a lot successfully done in the course of a year was definitely
acknowledged, but the fact that it was he, and not the rest of the board, who
showed up in front page pictures in The
News and Observer, or that he was appearing in WRAL, WTVD or WNCN video
news coverage, and not the others, was very troubling, they maintained.
As far as
that one board member, whose name The
Carolinian promised would not be revealed, was concerned, there was a
“need” for a “different” leadership style on the board, and the decision had
already been made.
That board
member then cut the conversation short to go meet with Supt. Jim Merrill.
Certainly
many, if not all of the seven Wake School Board members who voted to dismiss
Chairman Keith Sutton Dec. 3rd will publicly disagree with most, if not all of
the above. As far as they’re concerned, what they did was necessary for the
future of Wake County Public Schools. Those board members - five Democratic, one Republican and
one unaffiliated - believe that theirs should be a unified,
cohesive effort now to tackle the issues before them.
By doing
what they did, the way they did it, without ever saying a word, the white board
majority conceded that none of them possessed the political skills or
acumen that their black board chairman clearly had. So the only way to now bury
his singular accomplishments with the past, is to cut him lose entirely, and
forge ahead to rack up their own collective accomplishments in the future.
Some of them indeed, now
want their faces on the front pages of the major newspaper, and in all the
major media.
Problem –
the very reason why Sutton had to go Lone Ranger in the first place, is about to rear its ugly
head.
By all
accounts, neither new Chairwoman Christine Kushner nor new Vice Chairman Tom
Benton possess the political skills to deal with two staunch adversaries of the
school board – newly-elected Wake Commission Board Chair Phil Matthews and Vice
Chair Tony Gurley.
And they'll have to.
When it
comes to strong right-wing conservatism, both Matthews and Gurley are miles ahead of the man Keith
Sutton built a solid, trusting relationship with – moderate former Wake Commission Chair
Joe Bryan.
Indeed, Gurley,
who has served as chair and vice chair of the commission board before, has made
it clear that he will try again to get commission control of the school
system’s properties next state legislative session. And the day before the
school board convened Dec. 3rd, the Republican majority voted to withhold $5
million in funding for the design of four new schools (by state law, county
commission boards in North Carolina control the purse strings of all boards of
education, who do not have taxing authority to raise their own funding) until
they get more answers about the price tag.
That, in
addition to the commission board voting unanimously two weeks ago to stall a
school system lease on a site for the new Abbotts Creek Elementary School in
North Raleigh. All of those votes are delaying important Wake school system projects
to meet projected student growth demands.
Matthews, Gurley and the rest of the GOP majority on the Wake County Commission Board, could care less.
Matthews, Gurley and the rest of the GOP majority on the Wake County Commission Board, could care less.
A "Chairman" Keith Sutton, based on the trust he had developed via the school bond issue,
may have been able to skillfully paddle around what clearly is yet another challenging political obstacle.
Kushner and
Benton, on the other hand, have absolutely no relationship with Matthews and Gurley that promises the same, so
clearly, they now start at a disadvantage with two right-wing leaders they’ll
have to very delicately deal with.
And if they
pull Martin, Evans, Hill and Fletcher into the mix, the results won’t be
anymore promising. If they get anything, it will be at a political price
Matthews and Gurley will impose.
And enjoy.
Then
there’s the issue of the plethora of high poverty schools that have been left
in the wake of the Republican policies when the GOP dominated the school board from
2009 – 2011. In their zeal to establish neighborhood schools and school choice,
that GOP board eliminated Wake’s successful student diversity policy, helping
to create more schools where the student population is at least fifty percent
free-and-reduced lunch.
The result,
according to recently published reports, is that Wake now has more failing
schools where the population is majority black, Hispanic, and poor.
Removing
the black school board chairman at a critical time when Wake's African-American
community trusts that this critical issue will be resolved fairly and equitably,
may prove to be a mistake now. Even when Sutton was still chair, the board made
clear that it was not returning to student assignment to alleviate pressures on
student achievement. Parents don't want it.
But putting
tens of millions of dollars into providing the vital resources needed in high
poverty schools appears not to be an option either, especially in these tight
budget times.
So will the
new Kushner-Benton Wake School Board decide to allow these high poverty
schools just to exist without further aid, as many other public school
districts across the state and nation have done?
And how
will that look after the board has unceremoniously dumped the one voice many of
those high poverty school students had as chair?
Only time
will tell.
Tuesday
evening, when asked by the media – who were so shocked by what had just
happened that they had to admit The
Carolinian had beaten all of them on the story by two weeks – to explain
the reason for Chairman Keith Sutton’s ouster,
the Kushner Seven could, but would not, give a reason.
“It’s not
about one person,” Kushner told the eager cameras and reporters. ‘It’s about us
coming together as a board.”
Amazingly,
when asked for his take on what he had just voted for, Jim Martin is quoted
telling the media that the board majority tried to get Sutton to agree to
support Kushner’s chair nomination in order to have a unanimous vote by acclamation,
but Sutton refused.
Martin, in
effect, was blaming Sutton for not giving the Kushner Seven the political cover
they needed to carry out his own demise.
In doing
so, Martin may have admitted to something that got the previous Republican
board in trouble in 2009 – that he, Kushner, Fletcher, Benton, Evans, Hill, and
even new member Zora Felton, all concluded, and agreed, at some point in time, to not only
get Sutton out, but pressure him to concede BEFORE a vote.
With six of
those seven board members serving before Tuesday’s swearing-in, the question
must be asked, “Did they, a majority of the Wake School Board, meet to discuss
public business, namely the election of a new school board chair, without
alerting the public, as they are legally obligated too?”
We may
never know the truth.
Members of the African-American community
sat in shock and silence, not believing that the Democratic school board they
had once worked so hard to elect in 2011, had just stabbed one of their best,
brightest, and arguably most effective young leaders in the back right in front
of them.
They would have been further shocked to know, according to
sources, that some of the school board members even worried, amongst
themselves, that black audience members would angrily react to what had just
happened.
That did not happen.
Now
ex-Chairman Keith Sutton, in a stated moment of defiant personal privilege,
called on his strength as a Christian, and as a black man, to proudly declare that
as much as the board majority would like to rhetorically say otherwise, he had
nothing to be ashamed of in his leadership.
“I hope I
have served you and the community well, and made you proud, Sutton stoically told his many stunned supporters, adding for those saddened by what they just saw, “Trust in God.”
The entire
room – even the seven board colleagues who would not tell the public why they
had just dumped perhaps the best school board chairman Wake County has ever had
- stood and applauded.
Christine
Kushner then immediately took Sutton’s chairman seat, read from a prepared statement, and with a straight face...called for board unity.
-30-
Interesting thoughts, Cash. You're missing the bigger issues, though. This isn't about race or the white members being intimidated by Sutton's skills. It is about the schism within the black community about the school system's policies and Great Schools in Wake/CCCAAC's influence over the Dem board members, particularly Kushner, Evans & Martin. Sutton crossed those two groups several times and didn't toe their line. Sutton was willing to cross lines to make the best decisions for all students. Those two groups are not. They are closed to any ideas but their own and Sutton was a threat to their influence.
ReplyDeleteActually, Ms. Mansfield, I was saying the same thing, just not from the same purview as yours, which I thoroughly understand. To do exactly as you point out would have forced me to include folks who ultimately did not on vote Tuesday night. Make no mistake, I am fully aware of what you're saying, but it was my purpose to hold the board members directly responsible of their votes that evening. Thank you for reading the piece, and for your response.
ReplyDeleteBy the way, i know that it is fashionable to say "race had nothing to do with it," but i also notice that many don't understand my community's perspective. We've been through this kind of thing before, and trust me, if Keith sutton came from a monied, influential district, this wouldn't have happened in this manner, because then board members would have to explain it to folks they would depend on to give them money. They disrespected Keith because he stepped far beyond their unconscious permission, and when the time came for them to vote, they cared more about their perceived unity, than what they were doing looked like beyond their scope - seven whites against two blacks. If someone could have shaken them, they should have realized that if they had a majority, it was better to win the vote by what would look like a real election, than to win what appeared to all to be a racial landslide - all of the whites against all of the blacks. Once that happened, Ms. Mansfield, it was what it was, and it was damned sloppy!
ReplyDeleteThanks for responding and for taking my comments as I intended--as respectful dialog. It's hard to tell tone and intent online sometimes. I was too flip with the 'race had nothing to do with it' comment. While I don't think race itself was the primary motivator for the vote I do realize that I don't understand your community's perspective. I can never fully understand it because I'm not part of it but I do try hard to look at things from different points of view. You're also right about this being a post about holding the board members responsible. Perhaps the larger issues behind it all could be another post on this blog someday.
ReplyDeleteThere are so many issues going on here and they go back many years. I think that Wake County as a whole needs to have an honest discussion about it all but everybody seems to be afraid to do so. The motivations behind the diversity policy and magnet schools are not all altruistic but nobody wants to admit it. There's still a lot of tension and distrust between different factions but it's easier to put on a happy face and not have to deal with it. I get that but it's frustrating because our school system should be better than it is at reaching all students but it will never get there if we keep sweeping things under the rug.
On those points, Ms. Mansfield, you and I have little argument.
ReplyDeleteTake care.
Cash
What a post i found now! I want to reduce my fat but i don't find any way for my overeating.So this is interesting because i can drink beside it decrease my fat naturally. Optical Express News . In a few cases a second supposition may be important. Like all laser eye techniques, in the event that you are recognized inadmissible for laser medicine there are more than enough options. Your optician will have the ability to assess your necessities at an in-profundity discussion.
ReplyDelete